a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2023 Law Offices of Ernest Goodman - Los Angeles - New York.
All Rights Reserved.

9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Our Opening Hours Mon. - Fri.

+1818-858-0406

Call Us.

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
 

Immigration Law

Law Offices of Ernest Goodman > Immigration Law

Why Long-Term Strategy Matters in Immigration Litigation

Survivorship Bias, Unrealistic Expectations, and the Danger of Rejecting Honest Legal Advice In immigration litigation, one of the most important principles is also one of the most difficult for clients to accept: a successful legal strategy must account for the possibility of losing....

Continue reading

Grasping at Straws Is a Bad Strategy

Why chasing unlikely outcomes, ignoring probabilities, and falling victim to survivorship bias can cost you everything Whether you're dealing with immigration law, filmmaking, business, investing, or even your personal life, one principle remains the same: grasping at straws is a bad strategy....

Continue reading

Appeals in Federal Circuit Courts: Procedural Law Matters

An immigration case is not necessarily lost simply because an immigration judge denies asylum, withholding of removal, or another form of relief. Likewise, an unfavorable decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) does not always mean that all available legal remedies have been exhausted....

Continue reading

Morozova v. Blanche: Another Ninth Circuit Case Moving Toward Oral Arguments 

Another piece of good news from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Morozova v. Blanche, No. 25-4067, is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. The Ninth Circuit has advised counsel that the case is being considered for a 2027 Pasadena sitting and has requested that the parties identify any scheduling conflicts....

Continue reading

Fertikh v. Blanche: Due Process Before the Ninth Circuit

On September 16, 2026, I had the opportunity to argue Fertikh v. Blanche, No. 25-7834, before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Pasadena, California. Arguing before the Ninth Circuit was a memorable professional experience. The Pasadena courthouse itself adds to the atmosphere—the beautiful historic building, with its colonial-style architecture and impressive interior, provides a striking setting for a federal appellate argument. The appeal raises important questions concerning procedural due process in immigration proceedings, including adequate notice, denial of a continuance, and whether a respondent was provided a meaningful opportunity to prepare and present his case. For me, one of...

Continue reading

Cheap Title Reports vs. Professional Clearance

In today’s entertainment industry, filmmakers frequently look for the fastest and cheapest possible title report before submitting a project to festivals, distributors, streaming platforms, or E&O insurance carriers. At first glance, low-cost “instant” title search companies appear attractive: $99 reports, same-day turnaround, automated trademark searches, and promises of “quick clearance.” For independent filmmakers working with tight budgets, this may sound practical....

Continue reading

Motion to Enforce Habeas Corpus in Immigration Detention Cases

In recent months, federal habeas corpus litigation has become one of the most important tools for immigrants held in prolonged immigration detention. Across the United States, immigration detainees and their attorneys increasingly turn to federal district courts when bond hearings before immigration judges fail to provide meaningful due process protections....

Continue reading

Oral Argument Considered by Ninth Circuit in Our Client’s Case: Fertikh v. Blanche

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has notified the parties that the case of Fertikh v. Blanche is being considered for oral argument during the Pasadena sitting calendar in September 2026. Consideration for oral argument is a significant procedural development in a federal appellate case. In many immigration appeals, matters are decided solely on the written briefs. When a case is considered for oral argument, it may indicate that the Court wishes to examine the legal and factual issues in greater depth through direct questioning of counsel. Our client, Anton Fertikh, is an asylum seeker from Russia and...

Continue reading